Swami Yatindranand Giri raised questions on the Supreme Court | Swami Yatindranand Giri raised questions on the Supreme Court: said- If Muslims want to hide their identity, they should do so, write Hindu in big letters – Sambhal News
The controversy over putting name plates on shops and hotels during the Kanwar Yatra came to an end after the Supreme Court’s ban. But this controversy is again in discussion in Sambhal. The Mahamandaleshwar of Juna Akhara has questioned the Supreme Court’s ban on name plates and said that Muslims are not following the Supreme Court’s ban on their shops and hotels.
,
Nameplates are placed outside offices
Mahamandaleshwar Swami Yatindranand Giri of Juna Akhara, who reached Sambhal in the month of Shravan, has said that there is no big deal in revealing the identity. Officers, doctors, engineers, CAs, judges, police all wear name plates. They have name plates. Name plates are installed outside offices.
Then what is the problem in putting up nameplates? Questioning the Supreme Court’s ban on nameplates, Mahamandleshwar said that if Muslims want to hide their identity, they can do so, but Hindus should put up nameplates in bold letters on their shops.
The decision of the Supreme Court is beyond our understanding
Swami Yatindranand Giri said that recently the governments of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh had decided that all shopkeepers should clearly identify themselves. They should write their names, but the Supreme Court unnecessarily banned this. People did not understand this decision of the Supreme Court because all the government officials put up their name plates.
All the offices have nameplates. In such a situation, if shopkeepers are being asked to put up nameplates, what is the objection or harm of the Supreme Court in this? Today, Aadhar card is asked for everywhere. Identity card is asked for. This decision of the Supreme Court is beyond our understanding.
30 to 40 years old cases are pending
He said that religion and caste have nothing to do with this. When policemen wear nameplates, judges wear nameplates, then why is there discrimination in this? Why is this being seen through the prism of communalism?
Mahamandleshwar said that the speed with which the Supreme Court decided on this is also worth considering. Because 30 to 40 years old cases are pending, their hearing date is not even coming.
Whenever any case related to Sanatan Hindu Dharma or against Hindu Dharma comes up, the Supreme Court gets activated at midnight. It starts giving decisions on it overnight. Today the question arises whether the Supreme Court of India is working against Hindutva and Sanatan?
Discover more from Divya Bharat 🇮🇳
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
