Centre Must Work Within Boundaries Of Constitution: Supreme Court
The remarks were made by a 5-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court. (File)
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court Thursday said the Centre must exercise its powers within the boundaries created by the Constitution and the Delhi government be allowed to function in its domain, saying the “principles of democracy and federalism are essential features” and form part of the basic structure.
The significant observations were made by a five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud in the judgement holding that the Delhi government has legislative and executive powers over administration of services except for public order, police and land.
“The Union of India must exercise its powers within the boundaries created by the Constitution. NCTD having a sui generis (unique) federal model, must be allowed to function in the domain charted for it by the Constitution,” said the judgement on the issue of a festering feud over services between the ruling AAP dispensation and the Centre.
The top court observed that though the National Capital territory of Delhi (NCTD) could not be accorded the status of a state under the Constitution, the concept of federalism would still be applicable to it.
“The principles of democracy and federalism are essential features of our Constitution and form a part of the basic structure. Federalism in a multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic country like India ensures the representation of diverse interests. It is a means to reconcile the desire of commonality along with the desire for autonomy and accommodate diverse needs in a pluralistic society,” it said.
Recognising regional aspirations strengthens the unity of the country and embodies the spirit of democracy, it said.
“Thus, in any federal Constitution, at a minimum, there is a dual polity, that is, two sets of government operate: one at the level of the national government and the second at the level of the regional federal units. These dual sets of government, elected by “We the People” in two separate electoral processes, is a dual manifestation of the public will…,” it said.
It said though Delhi is not a full-fledged state, its legislative assembly is constitutionally entrusted with the power to legislate upon the subjects in the State List and Concurrent List of the Constitution.
“It is not a State under the First Schedule to the Constitution, yet it is conferred with power to legislate upon subjects in Lists II and III to give effect to the aspirations of the people of NCTD. It has a democratically elected government which is accountable to the people of NCTD,” it said.
Referring to the ‘sui generis’ character of Delhi, the unanimous verdict said this is the asymmetric federal model adopted for the national capital.
“While NCTD remains a Union Territory, the unique constitutional status conferred upon it makes it a federal entity for the purpose of understanding the relationship between the Union and NCTD. The majority in the 2018 Constitution Bench judgment held that while NCTD could not be accorded the status of a State, the concept of federalism would still be applicable to NCTD,” it said.
The interpretation of Article 239AA, which deals with the power and status of Delhi in the Constitution, in an “expansive manner” would further the basic structure of federalism, it said.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
