Future Retail says if HC order is not vacated, it will be ‘disastrous’ for the firm

HC’s interim order was passed on a plea of Amazon which has invested ₹1,43l crore in FCPL

Future Retail Limited (FRL) on Thursday said if the interim order of the Delhi High Court directing status quo with regard to its assets sale deal with Reliance Retail was not vacated, it would have “disastrous” consequences for the Kishore Biyani-led company.

“It is almost a ₹25,000 crore deal in which Reliance will take over [FRL’s] shops. Reliance will take over all the liabilities. So all the banks and financial institutions are safe. And put money on the table,” senior advocate Harish Salve, representing FRL, said.

“Also, very important aspect of the deal was 25,000 employees will be safe. This deal was done sometime in August 2020,” Mr. Salve added.

The High Court’s Tuesday interim order was passed on a plea of e-commerce giant Amazon, which has invested ₹1,43l crore on Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. (FCPL). FCPL has 9.82% stake in FRL.

During the hearing, a Bench of Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh asked, “This deal, was it approved by the appropriate authority?”

There is a petition before NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal), Mr. Salve replied. “Amazon invested ₹1,430 crore. When the market crashed … their investment is worth zero. Because of market circumstances. In fact, by this transaction [with Reliance] some value may come back to their ₹1,430 crore,” Mr. Salve continued.

“They [Amazon] are not interested in ₹1,430 crore. They [Amazon] don’t mind it being zero as long as Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Group does not get the FRL shops,” he added.

On the other hand, senior advocate Gopal Subramanium, representing Amazon, argued that as of today, there is no appeal or application to vacate the emergency arbitrator (EA) award of October 25 which had barred FRL from taking any steps to transfer its retail assets.

“Can a party infringe an order without even challenging it. Even in the suit, there is no challenge to the Emergency Award,” Mr. Subramanium argued.

“FRL was a beneficiary of ₹1,430 crore. Can FRL today argue that the very agreement which enable it to receive the money are all contrary to FEMA [Foreign Exchange Management Act],” Mr. Subramanium said.

“The money, ₹1,430 crore, which was given to FCPL was immediately to be downstream to FRL under the agreement. This downstream investment is very well known in India and protective rights are often given,” he said.

“We are interested in having a long relationship with the promoter and these companies. Because we are working not only in the wholesale sector, we were also hoping that one day when the retail sector opens up, these assets will be there for the purpose of further investment into the country,” Mr. Subramanium said. As the arguments remain inconclusive, the High Court will continue the proceedings on Friday.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day’s newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

Personalised recommendations

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Faster pages

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.


A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.


We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *