Haridev Joshi University in controversy: HOD of print department had experience of only about 5 years, wanted 8 years


Jaipur2 hours agoAuthor: Smit Paliwal

Questions have been raised on the appointment of Manoj Lodha, HOD of the print department of Haridev Joshi Journalism University in the university. A complaint was made against him for getting the job of Associate Professor in the University by furnishing wrong documents and facts. The complaint was also investigated and now the university has taken this matter on the agenda in the meeting of the Board of Management to be held on April 28. It will be discussed in the presence of the members in the meeting of the Board of Management. If everyone agrees, then legal action can also be taken against Lodha.

At the same time, there is confusion among the students of Haridev Joshi Journalism University regarding this entire recruitment controversy. Because if Manoj Lodha is disqualified, question marks will be raised on the degree of hundreds of students studying under his leadership along with PhD students during his tenure.

The university committee has termed Lodha’s appointment as wrong. In such a situation, in the meeting of the Board of Management, a decision will be taken regarding the action on Lodha.

Complainant Satyendra Singh Rathod has alleged that Manoj Lodha does not have sufficient academic experience under the UGC Regulations 2010. When he was appointed in 2012, he was ineligible for this appointment. Therefore, his appointment has been made on the basis of wrong facts. The complainant has complained about the appointment of Manoj Lodha in violation of 4.3.0 of the UGC Regulation 2010.

A departmental inquiry by the university has revealed that Manoj Lodha, chairman of the journalism department, did not have sufficient academic experience under the UGC regulation 2010 at the time of appointment.

A departmental inquiry by the university has revealed that Manoj Lodha, chairman of the journalism department, did not have sufficient academic experience under the UGC regulation 2010 at the time of appointment.

Here is the UGC guideline 4.3.0 (Co-Prof)

  • Excellent academic record obtained in PhD degree in allied / allied / relative subjects.
  • Master’s degree with minimum 55% marks or equivalent grade in any ‘point scale’ where grading system is followed.
  • Minimum 8 years of teaching or research experience equivalent to the level of Assistant Professor in any University/College/Accredited Research Institute/Industry. as well as all experience in addition to research conducted for the PhD and supported by evidence from published works. Minimum of 5 published works, which must be supported by books / research / thematic policy related forms.
  • The candidate should have experience in a new curriculum and curriculum with pedagogical innovative design and its technology-oriented educational process. Along with this, produce evidence that he has guided research students and candidates.
  • Along with this, the Academic Performance Index (API) has a performance based critical approach. According to all these, it is mandatory to have a minimum score.
An investigation was initiated against Manoj Lodha during the tenure of Om Thanvi.

An investigation was initiated against Manoj Lodha during the tenure of Om Thanvi.

Inquiry committee considers Manoj Lodha ineligible

  • At the time of application in the year 2012, Manoj Lodha did not have 8 years of working experience as per the UGC guidelines. In the investigation of the committee, it has been found that Manoj Lodha had work experience of only 4 years and 8 months.
  • It is also learned that Manoj Lodha was not eligible to apply even academically at the time of application. The committee has also found a discrepancy in the document of Lodha’s phd, which will be placed in the BOM meeting.
  • It has also been found in the report that in the selection committee that was formed in the year 2012 for applications, 14 people had applied. The selection committee had disqualified all the 14 people as per the guidelines of the UGC. After this a new committee was secretly formed. Who appointed Manoj Lodha. In such a situation, the then Selection Committee has also come under scrutiny.

Om Thanvi hatched a conspiracy: Manoj Lodha Manoj Lodha says that during the tenure of Om Thanvi, many such works were being done in the university, which were not according to the rules. When I protested against him, he started harassing me. First of all, I was removed from the post of Dean. After that removed from the post of Director and after that also removed from the post of Head of the Department. Even then, when I kept opposing his exploits, he raised questions on my qualifications, while my appointment was done according to the guidelines of the UGC.

Committee was formed after complaint: Om Thanvi
Om Thanvi, former vice-chancellor of Haridev Joshi Journalism University, said that complaints were received continuously regarding the appointment of Manoj Lodha. The initial investigation of which was done by the internal committee of the university itself. After this, the investigation of Lodha’s appointment was handed over to the external committee, which included three professors from outside the university. Based on the investigation report and legal opinion of all the three professors, now the decision on the appointment of Lodha will be taken in the BOM meeting itself.

The appointment was done under the rules – Sunny Sebastian
Sunny Sebastian, who was the Vice Chancellor of Haridev Joshi Journalism University in the year 2012, said that Manoj Lodha was appointed as per the guidelines of the UGC. Then he was appointed on the basis of work experience as per the guidelines of the Attorney General. At that time, not only Manoj Lodha, but Narayan Bareth and Rajan Mahan were also appointed on the basis of work experience. Don’t know why some people are unnecessarily trying to bring Manoj’s appointment into controversy.

There is more news…

,



Source link

%d bloggers like this: