ICC and BCCI raise controversy: Indian board is against auction system for organizing tournaments like World Cup


Troubled with Ads? Install Dainik Bhaskar app for news without ads

New Delhi13 minutes ago

  • Copy link

Sourav Ganguly has returned to work after suffering a heart attack twice.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the International Cricket Council (ICC) are once again on a collision course. The ICC wants to distribute the hosting of all its tournaments, including the World Cup, from 2023 to 2031, based on the auction system. At the same time, the BCCI wants the hosting of these events to be as per rotation as before.

Sourav Ganguly attended ICC members meeting
The meeting was held on Wednesday to discuss ICC events from 2023 to 2031. BCCI was represented by President Sourav Ganguly. Ganguly has appeared in a meeting for the first time after being hospitalized twice due to a heart attack. It is not that only BCCI is angry with this decision of ICC. The other two countries in the Big Three in the cricket world, England and Australia are also not happy with this. Generally, most major ICC events have been held in India, England or Australia.

E-mail sent to members for 20 global tournaments
According to an ESPN report, in February last year, the ICC sent an e-mail to all Full, Associate and Affiliate members for 20 global tournaments for the 8-year cycle from 2023 to 2031. In this, members were asked to submit a tender if they want to organize a tournament. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is also among the boards that have shown interest in ICC’s mail. The PCB had said that it intends to submit the bid with the UEA board. On the other hand, India, England and Australia did not respond to this mail.

BCCI is not in favor of extra event
The ICC plans to hold at least one global event every year from 2023 to 2031. For this, an extra tournament has to be added to the event cycle. BCCI, Cricket Australia (CA) and ECB are not in favor of it. The ICC had decided in October 2019 that it would hold a global event every year from 2023. The BCCI’s objection is that when this decision was taken, the administration of the Cricket Board in India was not in the hands of the elected body. According to the guidelines of the Supreme Court, at that time the Adhoc Committee was looking after the work.

Big Three wants priority
Cricket boards of India, Australia and England want priority to host large ICC tournaments. They believe that when most of the revenue related to cricket comes from these countries, then they should also get priority in organizing. Sourav Ganguly himself is not against the one-day World Cup in Africa and the T20 World Cup in America. But, he believes that India should get priority. There should be no compulsory bidding for this.

Olympic or Football World Cup should not be compared
Cricket boards of India, Australia and England say that cricket tournaments should not be compared to Olympic or Football World Cup. Hundreds of countries participate in them. The best infrastructure for cricketing events is in India, Australia and England. Ignoring them, it is not fair to think of organizing in small countries.

There are more news …

.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.