Responsibility for border tensions ‘lies entirely with India’: Beijing

China on Wednesday said “the responsibility lies entirely with the Indian side” for the continuing tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and a new stand-off in the Chushul sector.

Also read: China questions India’s account of LAC tensions

India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said on Tuesday the Chinese troops engaged in “provocative action” on August 31, while discussions between ground commanders were on-going. This followed earlier moves on the night of August 29 which, the Army said, were ‘provocative’ military movements to change the status quo. To pre-empt these moves, the Army said, India undertook measures “to strengthen our positions” near the south bank of Pangong Lake in Ladakh.

On Wednesday, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said to a question on the current situation there, “You just said that the Indian side pre-empted China’s action. In China we have a saying about a guilty mind protesting conspicuously he’s innocent. That is what India did. It shows that the Indian troops illegally crossed the line in provocation and unilaterally changed the status quo and broke the two sides’ agreement and consensus.”

Ms. Hua said: “From the beginning of this year, the Indian Army repeatedly broke consensus and agreements and unilaterally with force changed the status quo, destabilising the border region and causing tensions”. “The responsibility lies entirely with the Indian side,” she said.

Also read: Chinese troops engaged in ‘provocative action’ again: MEA

“China has exercised great restraint to avoid escalation. Communicating through diplomatic and military channels, China urged the Indian side to discipline frontline troops, stop provocation, pull back illegal trespassers and stop actions leading to escalation and complication. We hope India will work together with China for the same goal, implement the leaders consensus and the two sides agreements and work with concrete actions to contribute to peace and tranquillity along the border.”

India has said the latest tensions on the south bank of the Pangong Lake followed China’s similar moves along the the border since early May, where it has sought to redraw the LAC in the Galwan Valley, Depsang Plains, north bank of Pangong Lake and in the Gogra-Hot Springs area, in addition to mobilising large number of troops.

A clash in the Galwan Valley on June 15 claimed the lives of 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese soldiers.

Also read: Status quo at Pangong Tso has been changed, says Colonel Dinny (retd.)

Asked on Wednesday by Reuters to comment about reports that a Tibetan officer part of India’s Special Frontier Force had died on August 29 in a landmine blast near the site of recent border tensions and on the presence of Tibetan officers in India’s Special Frontier Force going back to the 1960s, Ms. Hua said: “You were talking about whether there are Tibetans-in-exile in Indian troops. I’m not aware of that, perhaps you can ask your colleague in India to ask the Indian side. You mentioned the 1960s [and the role of] the CIA and Tibetans-in-exile. These are thought provoking words. We need to think about the Tibetan issue, and the ins and outs and role of the United States. China’s position is very clear. We oppose any country, of course that includes India, to provide any facilitation or venue to forces advocating Tibet independence. As to the relationship between Tibetans in-exile and in Indian troops, I am also very curious. If you could get more information with your report, I would appreciate that.”

On Wednesday, the Communist Party-run Global Times, in an editorial published in its English and Chinese editions, said “the system that has managed the border situation for decades is now crumbling” and “regular border frictions will exhaust both countries”.

Also read | China controls 1,000 sq. km of area in Ladakh

“India’s actions have seriously increased the strategic mistrust between China and India and heightened the damage border frictions are creating on relations between the two countries. India has cancelled much cooperation with China since Galwan Valley clash. Its nationalism is inflicting damage to itself,” the editorial said.

“Neither China nor India is willing to keep their relations at the cost of losing territory. But the same disputes have been there for decades, and they shouldn’t have been allowed to resurface. Chinese public opinion hasn’t focused on the China-India border issues, but India has always been fanatical. One will suspect that India is misguided,” the newspaper added.

Also read: LAC standoff | Completing disengagement will require reciprocal actions, says India

“China is an immovable neighbour and much stronger than India. The two countries are suitable to be partners in seeking common development. But if New Delhi wants to label Beijing its long-term strategic rival, it needs to be prepared to pay a huge cost. In the meantime, it will never manage to get one more inch of land at China-India border areas.”

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

To get full access, please subscribe.

Already have an account ? Sign in

Show Less Plan

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day’s newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Faster pages

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.


A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

Personalised recommendations

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.


We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad mobile applications and print. Our plans enhance your reading experience.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.