Committee had made recommendations to bail out sectors affected by the COVID-19 stress
The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Centre and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) about steps taken to implement the K.V. Kamath Committee report, which had made recommendations to bail out sectors affected by the COVID-19 stress.
A Bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan said an additional affidavit filed by the government late last week did not address “several issues” raised in writ petitions highlighting the plight of borrowers, small and big, who were being charged compound interest, post the pandemic moratorium, which expired on August 31.
Also Read | ‘Review choice of Kamath as head of panel’
The additional affidavit had informed the Supreme Court about the government’s decision to “hand-hold” small and vulnerable borrowers and waive the compound interest (interest on interest) accumulated against their loans during the six-month moratorium period. But the waiver of compound interest is only applicable for loans up to ₹2 crore, the Ministry of Finance told the court. The relief of waiver of compound interest during the six-month moratorium will be for MSME, education, housing, consumer durables, credit card, auto, personal and consumption loans.
During the hearing, the court went on to ask the government whether it had so far issued any circulars, policy decisions and so on based on the Kamath panel report, which has made suggestions for a loan resolution or restructuring scheme for 26 pandemic-distressed sectors.
Senior advocate Aryama Sundaram said the real estate sector had been completely left out.
The court said the government and the RBI had brought nothing on record to show what been done to implement the Kamath panel report. At one point, Justice Bhushan asked why the report itself had not been placed on record in the court.
Also Read | ‘COVID-19 to hit auto, manufacturing sectors’
“We have nothing to hide. We will put it on record. It [report] is available in the public domain,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for both the government and the RBI, replied.
Senior advocate V. Giri, also for the RBI, said the government was deliberating. Charging of compound interest post moratorium would hit hard the ordinary person.
He assured the court that the report would be placed on record.
The court said it was not just about placing the report on record, but implementing it. The RBI and the government should issue circulars so that people know what benefits had been extended to them.
“It will be done,” the government and RBI sides responded.
“When will it be done… This has been going on for long. There is a need for a proper restructuring scheme,” Justice M.R. Shah, on the Bench, said.
Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the banking association, said the delay was hurting the banks. “Whatever the relief, the weight of it will fall on the banks,” Mr. Salve said.
The government said banks had to put in a mechanism to take care of the loan resolution plans, post-moratorium, for both big and small borrowers.
“We are trying to strike a balance here,” Justice Shah said.
The court allowed the parties to file their replies to the additional affidavit in a week. The Centre has to place on record the Kamath panel report along with circulars, policy decisions, if any, on the issue.
The court scheduled the next hearing on October 13.